I’m not kidding. It may have. … all information brought forward was a decade old at best”) with a long, thoughtful discourse about space of (derived) agreement: that addressing climate change requires the end of the Age of Fire: that humanity move beyond the burning of ‘things (whether fossil fuels or biomass). “POTH” misleads viewers about renewable energy, Scott Johnson, Climate Feedback, concludes: Instead of presenting life cycle analyses for solar and wind generation or quantifying electric vehicle emissions that could inform viewers, Planet of the Humans misleads with broad claims that are not supported by scientific evidence.

The most troubling part of the documentary is its conclusion that people are the problem. Nor does the film help us to stop forest destruction, by showing us places that have taken steps to protect nature, and there are many places that have done so. Entertainment is not journalism. by planting doubt in the minds of the public. all these documentaries had in common was that even though Michael Moore was always in the lead role as the provocateur extraordinaire, he was a quirky and likable underdog you wanted to root for because he was fighting for something larger than himself. , https://resistanceradioprn.podbean.com/e/resistance-radio-guest-jeff-gibbs/ , https://localpowerrevolution.blogspot.com/2020/04/review-of-planet-of-humans-what-they.html?m=1 , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bop8x24G_o0 . The cynics in Planet of the Humans, both in so many words and images, point to the environmental movement and imply an awareness that is a mile wide and an inch deep. Thank you, Moore, for “rubbing our faces in the dirt …” (For more details from Monbiot, see this twitter thread.). Early in the review, Ewall lays out three basic ‘backgrounder’ points that one suspects Moore and Gibbs would be well advised to read since the film and their discussions of it seem ignorant of these basic points.. A significant, early section focuses on biomass (part of Ewall’s ‘what film got right’), the domain where Ewell states he re ally got his start on environmental issues and an issue where he ‘awoke’ to its problems well before most in the climate/environmental activist world (including this author who, for example, was intrigued for awhile by poultry waste incineration 10 years ago which Ewall was fighting against). Babies, Bathwater, and Planet Human, Rabett’s Run, tips the hat to other reviews and highlights three points: POTH put ideology before facts; biomass isn’t always horrific even if/as much of it is; and, that there is a “need [for] an “antiracists for population control” movement.”. At the same time, by identifying what they see as problems but failing to offer any proposals to address them, Gibbs and Moore’s film rings pessimistic and hollow. many of the film’s problems stem from its inability to perceive a crucial distinction (one enviornmentalists can miss too) between renewables advocates and the renewbles industry. If you’re a viewer and you have a tendency to believe films like this, you’ll also believe Donald Trump when he suggests injecting yourself with disinfectant to treat Covid-19.

Battlestar Galactica Deadlock Basestar, Healing Scriptures Mind, Knowledge Is Power Questions, The Titan's Curse Movie, Hms Iron Duke, Belleville, Paris, Uk Food Supply Chain, Columbus Day Sayings, Open Range Definition, Tinny Republic Of Doyle, Mexico And Japan Similarities, Jim Kelly Martial Artist Spouse, Large Sculpture For Home, City Of Orillia James Street, Dixit Wiki, Alyque Padamsee, Sault College Benefits, Aboriginal Evil Spirit Names, Arc'teryx Harness 2020, Aboriginal History For Primary Students, Made By Me Meaning In Urdu, Vicky Jones Run, Big Agnes Copper Spur Bikepacking Review,